At almost every Kenner City Council meeting, at least one
item on the agenda is deferred for one reason or another. Often, a
Councilmember needs more time to learn about the item. Sometimes, they will
defer an item to give the author more time to line up enough votes to get the
item passed. Many times, the Kenner Council defers items without giving a
reason or “as a courtesy” to another Councilmember.
It’s a common occurrence.
This past meeting,
the Kenner City Council voted 7 – 0 to defer some new regulations on taxi cabs.
No reason was given and there was no public discussion. After the meeting, District 4 Councilwoman
Maria DeFranchesch told The Advocate that she didn’t want to pass an ordinance
only to revise it in the future.
“I believe it’s
inappropriate and totally wrong to vote on something unless you have a copy of
it,” and it is complete, DeFranchesch said.
I buy that. The
Council did too and the item was deferred.
About two months,
District 2 Councilman Joe Stagni reintroduced legislation to move the
boundaries of 2 precincts within his district. Previously, Councilman Stagni
had introduced this same legislation but deferred it because another governing
body was not ready for it. When they said that they were ready, Councilman
Stagni reintroduced it.
Sounds like a
simple bill, right? Move one precinct’s boundaries about 2 blocks, impact about
110 voters, and make it easier for them to get to their new polling place.
Council President Jeannie Black supported the legislation saying, “Anything
that makes it easier for people to vote, I am in favor of.”
But District 3
Councilman Keith Reynaud said – SLOW DOWN.
Reynaud, whose
district wouldn’t be affected by this change in boundaries, said that he didn’t
have enough time to study this issue. He said that he just received the
legislation on Monday and that the Thursday meeting just wasn’t long enough.
Councilman
Reynaud asked Councilman Stagni and the rest of the Council to grant him a “courtesy”
deferral so he could take more time.
Now, again, this
change in boundaries was for 2 precincts within Councilman Stagni’s district,
they weren’t near Councilman Reynaud’s district and wouldn’t impact him or his
constituents at all.
Councilwoman
Black again said that she supported the legislation and would be voting for it
but, as a “courtesy” (there’s that word again) to Councilman Reynaud, she would
vote FOR the deferral.
Councilman Stagni
was mildly upset but, he too said that he would support the deferral as a “courtesy”
to Councilman Reynaud.
So, the entire
Kenner City Council was willing to hold up legislation that would impact about
110 people, people who supported the change in boundaries, and that the Council
President said would make it easier for these people to vote, all as a “courtesy”
so Councilman Reynaud could have more time to “study” legislation that didn’t
impact him, his residents or his district.
That’s what makes
the situation at Thursday’s council meeting so puzzling.
Mayor Yenni
introduced a Resolution calling for the Council to approve fast-tracking
his plan to increase the city’s debt by 32% and bond out 75% of Kenner’s sales
tax revenue through the year 2033 to finance some beautification projects.
Councilwoman
DeFranchesch said, “The projects that were mentioned (in the Mayor’s plan) are
not written in stone,” yet the Resolution clearly calls for Kenner to ask the
State Bond Commission to approve Kenner bonding “an amount not to exceed $47
Million”. The $47 Million figure is eerily close to the projected cost of $46.4
Million for Mayor Yenni’s plan.
“All this is, is
a dialogue; it is not a commitment,” Defrancesch said.
So, if the
projects aren’t “written in stone”, doesn’t that also mean that, like the Taxi
legislation that Councilwoman DeFranchesch and the rest of the Council
deferred earlier in the meeting, the Mayor’s plan could very well be changed
and revised as we go along?
Since it is also
incomplete and will be revised, shouldn’t Councilwoman DeFranchesch (and the
rest of the Council) want to defer this Resolution too?
Makes sense to
me, probably you as well. That’s the problem.
I guess that it also
made sense to Councilmen Stagni and District 1 Councilman Gregory Carroll too. Unfortunately, they were the only 2 Councilmen that it did make sense to.
Councilman Stagni
introduced an Amendment (seconded by Councilman Carroll), to defer the
Resolution until he had time to poll his residents and see if they actually
wanted to take on so much debt for these projects proposed by Mayor Yenni.
“We got this
piece of legislation on Monday; today is Thursday,” Councilman Stagni said. “We
want to make it a transparent, open and collaborative process with the public
and ninety-five percent of the people that this affects, they don’t really know
what’s going on right now.”
“We are talking
about refinancing and going into debt and strapping our children and
grandchildren (with this debt),” Councilman Stagni continued. “Is it more
important to do beautification projects or infrastructure?”
“It is our job
(to get resident input); we’re the closest to our contstituents.”
Councilman
Carroll talked about the length of his district and said that he, too, was not
comfortable with the pace of the Resolution.
“It is my opinion
that I still need more time,” Councilman Carroll said.
The other Kenner
Councilmen disagreed.
Without
elaborating on what specifically she had done to seek input and inform the
resident of Kenner, Councilwoman-At-Large Michele Branigan said, “We’ve had
time to discuss this with constituents.”
Councilwoman
Branigan represents all of Kenner’s 66,000 residents.
Councilwoman
DeFrancesch agreed. “There’s no purpose in deferring this. I don’t see the
point to have a deferral. This is not the time.”
Claiming that the
Mayor and Council were starting the process prematurely, Councilman Stagni made
one last attempt to appeal to his fellow councilmen.
“This is a slap
in the face to the numerous citizens who don’t know what’s going on,” Stagni
said.
In the end, the Council voted 2-5 on the Deferral with only Councilmen Carroll and Stagni
voting “FOR” the Deferral. Similarly, the Resolution authorizing the Bond
Company to take the next steps with the State Bond Commission passed by a 5-2
vote with Councilmen Carroll and Stagni “Opposed”.
Despite not
having any Town Hall meetings or any polling data, Mayor Yenni contended that “I
have listened to the people.”
Really?
Late Friday
afternoon, Mayor Yenni finally agreed to hold a single Town Hall meeting this
Wednesday to discuss the plan with Kenner residents. According to his Facebook page, Councilman Reynaud is taking credit for setting up the Town Hall.
“If you have questions about the
2030 plan that has been proposed by the economic development committee please
come to this meeting that I asked the Mayor to set up,” the Councilman’s
Facebook page said.
So, the only Town Hall that the public is invited to to discuss the largest debt issuance in Kenner history wasn't even Mayor Yenni's idea.
It sounds a bit
hypocritical to me that Councilmen Black, Branigan, DeFranchesch, Denapolis and
Reynaud, who also held ZERO Town Hall meetings with their constituents, sent
out ZERO mail surveys, and did ZERO telephone polling, would not want to defer
a Resolution on the largest issuance of debt in Kenner history when they
previously sought deferrals on items that didn’t concern their districts, were
also incomplete or delivered on a Monday for a Thursday vote as this item was.
Of course, we’re
talking about Kenner so, I shouldn’t be surprised.
As I've said previously when discussing Mayor Yenni and his Administration:
"When you live in the land of hypocrisy, the skies are always sunny."
Sadly, for Kenner residents, the sun is shining in Yenniville.